I have 257.HK ... and is still suffered accounting losses ... and I am not going to add more although I think it "may" go back to >HK$7 ... because now I dislike the management.
Why 10/27? ... want to get rid of individual investors? ... Why not fairly and easily accountably 1/1 or 1/2 ?
Quite like 005.HK at 2019 : 5/12 @HK$28.1
I prefer those good management cos. e.g. 900.HK and 626.HK
I have 257.HK ... and is still suffered accounting losses ... and I am not going to add more although I think it "may" go back to >HK$7 ... because now I dislike the management.
回覆刪除Why 10/27? ... want to get rid of individual investors? ... Why not fairly and easily accountably 1/1 or 1/2 ?
Quite like 005.HK at 2019 : 5/12 @HK$28.1
I prefer those good management cos. e.g. 900.HK and 626.HK
^_^
Other good management cos. examples:
刪除086.HK ; 373.HK; 1883.HK ... not to say those local REITS.
They are with "low" P/E ratios and willing to pay "high" dividends, with Dividend Yields > 5%p.a.
刪除內地股國策是一切，光大國際這點無問題，大股東願6元供，此價安全.若管理層做足些，也不會調整這麼多，比機會你買。
刪除I think listed companies management should consider existing shareholders first.
刪除理論上實確如此，但真能做到的上市公司管理層，應1/10都冇。
刪除