免責聲明:

免責聲明:本網誌純屬個人文章, 所有評論全是表達個人意見, 絕對不應視作為投資見議. 本人同時不能保證文章內容的確實性. 讀者必須自行判斷和研究. 至於讀者的一切投資決定, 不論成敗得失. 一概與本人無關.

2019年3月20日星期三

又係李+誠的天下

業績期太多公司派成績表,看都看吾切,最新消息是四叔也退休了。最新業績報告則是其上市孖寶-恆地(012)及煤氣(003),維持10送1紅股及增派股息的優良傳統,希望其繼任人也能像四叔般善待小股東啦!
吾通香港商界又係李+誠的天下!

5 則留言:

  1. The policy of paying bonus shares is "clever".

    Actually issuing bonus shares add "no financial value" to the company except "incurring administration costs". All shareholders are fairly and proportionately get their bonus shares. As the total number of ordinary shares are increased, the NAV per share and future EPS would be diluted as a result.

    Yet this policy is highly appreciated by shareholders and market investors. Some even say that issuing "1 for 10 bonus shares every year" is equal to paying a cash dividend of 10%p.a.(i.e. with 10%p.a. dividend yield)!

    If 001.HK or 016.HK are also willing to "issue bonus shares every year", I think significant market money would immediately buy them and their market prices must be higher than now.

    I suggest those "profitable non blue chips" such as 626.HK and 900.HK should also consider to issue bonus shares besides cash dividends, ... in order to stimulate the market price to more reasonable level, ... say PE ratio around 10~12 for these good managed financial institutions.

    Too much words ... Just want to share my little thinking ... Please forgive me!

    ^_^

    回覆刪除
  2. 恕我坦白講,只是數字遊戲,對公司冇實際盈利幫助,只是股民受,有利股價而矣,這亦反影股民平均質素並不成熟。

    回覆刪除
  3. It is negative effect,as bonus shares incurrs admin cost....

    回覆刪除