Among the abovementioned stocks, 900.HK should be more reliable for 8%p.a. dividend. Its dividend payout % is kept in only around 50% over past 5 years.
1883.HK's net profit must be affected by "much lesser tourists" in Macau. It may have to pay 100% div. payout in order to maintain its 8% div. yield. I think it has the financial ability to do so.
Around 1/3 tenancy agreements are subject to renewal every year for most commercial property investment companies. I think 808.HK is no excuse for this. REITS are already paying >90% as dividends. I think 808.HK's div. yield will be gradually decreased in coming 3 years.
潮流興買超貴溢價股，越平越見鬼!
回覆刪除無耐
刪除似乎自己的價值回歸模式不是這時代杯茶。
回覆刪除係呀,我的投資成績也話我知.
刪除還是納指ETF穩陣。
回覆刪除我吾懂
刪除人性都係羊群心理
回覆刪除有質素有價值既平野冇人要
有水份賣到貴一貴大把人搶住要
股市只有輸贏 無對錯
刪除Just my little thinkings:~
回覆刪除Among the abovementioned stocks, 900.HK should be more reliable for 8%p.a. dividend. Its dividend payout % is kept in only around 50% over past 5 years.
1883.HK's net profit must be affected by "much lesser tourists" in Macau. It may have to pay 100% div. payout in order to maintain its 8% div. yield. I think it has the financial ability to do so.
Around 1/3 tenancy agreements are subject to renewal every year for most commercial property investment companies. I think 808.HK is no excuse for this. REITS are already paying >90% as dividends. I think 808.HK's div. yield will be gradually decreased in coming 3 years.
^_^
Thanks
刪除